The Trump administration’s declaration Monday that Israeli settlements on the West Bank are “not inconsistent with international law” reversed American policy on the settlements and contradicted the view of most countries.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel applauded the announcement as a “policy that rights a historical wrong,” while Saeb Erekat, the secretary general of the Palestine Liberation Organization, said it was an attempt by the Trump administration “to replace international law with the ‘law of the jungle.’”
Who is right? What does international law say? What difference does the United States announcement make?
Here’s a brief guide.
Are Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal?
The United Nations General Assembly, the United Nations Security Council and the International Court of Justice have all said that Israeli settlements on the West Bank violate the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Israel captured the West Bank from Jordan in the 1967 war and has occupied the territory ever since. The Fourth Geneva Convention, ratified by 192 nations in the aftermath of World War II, says that an occupying power “shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” The statute that established the International Criminal Court in 1998 classifies such transfers as war crimes, as well as any destruction or appropriation of property not justified by military necessity.
Israel argues that a Jewish presence has existed on the West Bank for thousands of years and was recognized by the League of Nations in 1922. Jordan’s rule over the territory, from 1948 to 1967, was never recognized by most of the world, so Israel also argues there was no legal sovereign power in the area and therefore the prohibition on transferring people from one state to the occupied territory of another does not apply.
The International Court of Justice rejected that argument in an advisory opinion in 2004, ruling that the settlements violated international law.
The Israeli Supreme Court and the government do consider settlement construction on privately owned Palestinian land to be illegal.
Under the Oslo Accords, signed by Israel and the Palestinians in the 1990s, both sides agreed that the status of Israeli settlements would be resolved by negotiation. However, negotiations have stalled and there have been no active peace talks since 2014.
What are the settlements?
Israel has built about 130 formal settlements in the West Bank since 1967. A similar number of smaller, informal settlement outposts have gone up since the 1990s, without government authorization but usually with some government support.
More than 400,000 Israeli settlers now live in the West Bank alongside more than 2.6 million Palestinians.
Some of the settlements are home to religious Zionists who believe that the West Bank, which Israel refers to by its biblical names of Judea and Samaria, is their biblical birthright. Many secular and ultra-Orthodox Jews also moved there largely for cheaper housing.
Some settlements were strategically located in line with Israel’s security interests. Other, more isolated communities were established for ideological reasons, including an effort to prevent a contiguous Palestinian state.
Israel also captured East Jerusalem in 1967, and annexed it. The Palestinians demand East Jerusalem as the capital of a future state, and much of the world still considers it occupied territory.
Most of the world views the expansion of Israeli settlements as an impediment to a peace agreement. While most blueprints for a peace agreement envisage a land swap — Israel retains the main settlement blocs, where a majority of the settlers live, and hands over other territory to the Palestinians — the more remote and populated the settlements, the harder that becomes.
What difference will the United States policy make?
The Trump administration’s declaration may be seen by supporters of the settlement enterprise as giving a green light to Israeli annexation plans. But Israeli experts cautioned that might not be the case.
“It’s one thing saying the settlements are not in violation of international law and another to say whether they are good for peace or not,” said Michael Herzog, an Israel-based fellow with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The Trump administration neither rejected nor endorsed Mr. Netanyahu’s annexation proposal, he said, and it remains “an open question” how it would react if Israel unilaterally annexed West Bank territory.
He and others said that while the policy change could affect the public perception of the settlements, the legal question would have little bearing on a comprehensive peace deal, which is ultimately a political act.
“The settlements are an agreed upon issue for negotiation between Israel and the Palestinians,” said Alan Baker, a former legal adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry. “It’s an issue that has yet to be negotiated.”
But in the absence of negotiations, the American policy could be used to justify even more settlement construction.
As the House decides what to do next with the impeachment inquiry, Ali Velshi and Stephanie Ruhle are joined by Politico’s Anna Palmer, NBC’s Jonathan Allen, and NBC’s Heidi Przybyla to break down what we can expect from lawmakers, Alexander … read more
If Amazon decides to fight the Pentagon’s decision to award a highly contested $10 billion cloud computing contract to Microsoft, it could act as early as next week. A challenge to the Defense Department’s award announced Friday is widely expected … read more
One-Third Of Gen Z Decides Who They Date Based On Astrology Welcome to VOL.UME: Love Now, a new series of stories chronicling how we find and experience romantic connections in the digital age. For the full experience, head to volume.mtv.com. … read more
Grifter President Decides Hosting G-7 at His Own Resort is Too Blatant a Grift, Even for Him On Saturday night, just two days after Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney announced the Trump administration’s intent to host the upcoming G-7 … read more
ESPN FC’s Steve Nicol decides whether these statements are overreactions or not: (0:12) Liverpool’s trio of Mohamed Salah, Sadio Mane and Roberto Firmino will break up after the 2019-20 season, (1:41) Gareth Bale will be Real Madrid’s best player this … read more
Apple Decides to Modernize and Dump the iPhone’s Numeric Branding just as Google Decides to Adopt it for Android 10 – Patently Apple Apple Decides to Modernize and Dump the iPhone’s Numeric Branding just as Google Decides to Adopt it … read more
‘Jersey Shore’: Ronnie Finally Decides To Get Help In Rehab After Jen Gives Him A Black Eye Ronnie Ortiz-Magro has a tough conversation about his relationship with Jen Harley and comes to the conclusion that he needs rehab on this … read more
After convoluted investigation, NFL decides not to suspend Chiefs’ Tyreek Hill – The Athletic KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Before Friday morning, Tyreek Hill had spent the past four-plus months away from the public, instead working, with diligence, to clear his … read more
Store owner decides to stop selling Confederate flag: It’s ‘being equated to a symbol used to incite genocide’ Kerry McCoy made a decision to stop selling the Confederate flag in her store. (Photo: Bannerisms/Kerry McCoy) More Upset with the way … read more
Huawei apparently decides it needs more bad press, puts ads on phone lock screens – Android Police Advertising has a time and a place, and the place is never on the lock screen of a smartphone you paid a lot … read more
Merkel Decides Her Chosen Successor Isn’t Up to the Job – Bloomberg Merkel Decides Her Chosen Successor Isn’t Up to the Job Bloomberg Angela Merkel warns against dark forces on the rise in Europe CNN European elections 2019: Germany results – BBC … read more
Trump heeds NRA, decides to pull U.S. out of U.N. arms treaty – AOL A gun rights demonstrator armed with a rifle walks past a sign memorializing the children and teachers killed in the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary … read more
YouTube Decides to Leave Neo-Nazi Propaganda Online In the aftermath of a neo-Nazi terrorist killing 50 people in a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand, tech companies spanning web hosts to social media giants have banned or shut down militant far-right … read more
The Left decides Kamala Harris is a cop — but she’s running anyway – Washington Examiner With nearly two years to go, almost anything in the realm of the 2020 presidential election could change from now until Election Day. The … read more
The Left decides Kamala Harris is a cop — but she’s running anyways – Washington Examiner With nearly two years to go, almost anything in the realm of the 2020 presidential election could change from now until Election Day. The … read more
Superintendent decides referee who made teen cut hair won’t work in district again A New Jersey superintendent decided the referee who made a black wrestler cut his dreadlocks before a match will not work in the district again at an … read more
Atlanta Decides Not to Impeach Mayor on Misdemeanor Macaroni Charges – The Root Screenshot: Keisha Bottoms (instagram) After proudly becoming one of the largest metropolitan cities in the U.S. to be led by a black woman, Atlanta was rocked by … read more
German court decides against trying alleged Nazi camp guard next FILE — In this July 1945 file photo the main gate is pictured at the Mauthausen Concentration Camp, near Linz, Austria. A German court has declined to put on trial … read more
Kelvin Benjamin decides he’s tired of losing and signs with the Chiefs for playoff run View photos Former Bills receiver Kelvin Benjamin will join the Chiefs. (AP Photo/Jeffrey T. Barnes) More Benjamin gives the Chiefs and Patrick Mahomes yet another … read more